How IT (Information Technology) Participation is Fundamental in EU AI Act Implementation?
What is the EU AI Act and why IT is the protagonist in its implementation
Trust This Team

How IT (Information Technology) Participation is Fundamental in EU AI Act Implementation?
How IT (Information Technology) Participation is Fundamental in EU AI Act Implementation?
What is the EU AI Act and why IT is the protagonist in its implementation
The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) represents one of the most significant regulatory transformations that Europe has faced in the digital realm. Since its implementation in 2024, it has completely redefined how companies develop, deploy, and manage AI systems, establishing fundamental rights and safety requirements for AI applications.
In 2026, we observe that the EU AI Act is no longer viewed merely as a legal obligation, but as a competitive differentiator and a matter of business survival. Fines can reach €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover, making compliance an absolute priority for any organization operating in the European market.
IT as the Strategic Foundation
The IT department emerges as the protagonist in this scenario because it holds the technical knowledge necessary to implement the protection and compliance measures required by the law. From configuring AI governance systems to creating automated processes for risk assessment and monitoring, technology is the foundation of an effective AI compliance strategy.
More than simply executing demands, IT professionals have become strategic consultants in the journey of EU AI Act compliance. They translate complex legal concepts into practical technical solutions, ensuring that AI safety and transparency are incorporated from the design of systems to their daily operation.
Main responsibilities of IT in EU AI Act compliance
The IT department assumes a central role in EU AI Act implementation, being responsible for translating legal requirements into practical and effective technological solutions. In 2026, with the maturation of AI governance practices, these responsibilities have become even more strategic.
Technical AI Governance Controls
The first pillar of action is implementing technical AI governance controls. This includes:
- AI model monitoring systems
- Bias detection algorithms
- Continuous performance assessment
IT must ensure that AI systems operate within acceptable risk parameters, creating protection layers that range from algorithmic auditing to secure model versioning.
Transparency and Explainability Requirements
Another crucial responsibility is developing functionalities that meet transparency and explainability requirements. Systems must provide:
- Clear documentation of AI decision-making processes
- Automated reporting on AI system performance
- Interfaces that allow users to understand how AI affects them
Many companies in 2026 have already implemented AI transparency dashboards where stakeholders can monitor system behavior autonomously.
AI-by-Design and Safety-by-Default Processes
IT must also establish AI-by-Design and Safety-by-Default processes, incorporating compliance requirements from the conception of new AI systems. This means:
- Evaluating AI risks in each project
- Implementing human oversight mechanisms
- Ensuring that default configurations always prioritize safety and compliance with EU AI Act requirements
Essential technologies and tools for law compliance in 2026
In 2026, the market offers a robust arsenal of technologies specifically developed to facilitate EU AI Act compliance. AI governance platforms have evolved significantly, offering real-time monitoring of AI system performance and automated risk classification.
AI Management Platforms
AI Management platforms have become indispensable for medium and large organizations. These solutions integrate:
- AI system mapping
- Risk assessment management
- Automated impact report generation
Tools like IBM Watson Governance, Microsoft Responsible AI, and European solutions like Mostly AI have gained prominence in the European market.
Advanced Explainable AI Techniques
Advanced explainable AI techniques, including LIME and SHAP algorithms, allow companies to provide transparency in AI decision-making while maintaining system performance. Automated bias detection and mitigation technologies facilitate compliance with fairness requirements.
Model Lifecycle Management Systems
Model Lifecycle Management (MLM) systems with granular version control ensure that only approved AI models are deployed in production. Implementation of automated audit logs and real-time compliance dashboards enables continuous monitoring of AI system compliance.
AI discovery tools use machine learning to automatically identify AI systems across corporate repositories, including legacy implementations. This capability is crucial for organizations still mapping their complete AI asset inventory in 2026.
Most common technical challenges in EU AI Act implementation
EU AI Act implementation in 2026 continues to present significant technical challenges for IT teams. Complete mapping of AI systems represents one of the greatest difficulties, especially in companies with legacy systems and complex architectures distributed across multiple platforms.
System Discovery and Classification
Automatic identification and classification of high-risk AI systems requires specialized AI governance tools and system discovery solutions. Many organizations face difficulties tracking AI model lineage between different systems, databases, and third-party applications.
Monitoring and Audit Systems
Another critical challenge is implementing granular monitoring controls and robust audit systems. IT teams need to develop mechanisms that allow:
- Continuous risk assessment
- Bias detection
- Performance monitoring without compromising system efficiency
Explainability Complexities
Explainability and transparency of AI decisions also present considerable technical complexities. It's necessary to implement algorithms that provide meaningful explanations while maintaining model performance and protecting intellectual property.
In 2026, we observe that integration with AI governance frameworks and automation of compliance processes have become essential to overcome these technical obstacles efficiently and sustainably.
AI system mapping: IT's strategic role
AI system mapping represents one of the most critical activities for EU AI Act compliance, and this is where IT's technical expertise becomes indispensable. In 2026, with the growing volume of AI applications deployed by organizations, this task requires deep knowledge of systems and technological infrastructure.
Technical Knowledge Requirements
The IT team possesses the technical knowledge necessary to identify:
- Where AI systems are deployed
- How they interact within the corporate network
- Which data sources they process
This includes everything from machine learning models in production to AI-powered analytics tools, cloud-based AI services, and even embedded AI in IoT devices.
Complete Lifecycle Documentation
Efficient mapping goes beyond simple system location. IT must document the complete AI lifecycle:
- Model development and training
- Deployment and monitoring
- Model retirement
This systemic view is fundamental for implementing adequate governance and compliance controls.
Competitive Advantage Through Mapping
Trends in 2026 show that organizations with well-structured AI mappings can respond more quickly to regulatory inquiries and have greater ease demonstrating compliance to supervisory authorities. Additionally, this process allows identifying optimization opportunities and risk reduction, transforming compliance into competitive advantage for the business.
AI security and risk management in practice
Practical implementation of AI security and risk management requires a robust and well-structured technical approach. In 2026, organizations have access to mature technologies that facilitate compliance with EU AI Act requirements.
AI Model Security
AI model security represents the first pillar of protection, applied to both model training and inference phases. Automated backup systems with end-to-end encryption ensure that AI models remain protected even in case of breaches.
Simultaneously, role-based access controls ensure that only authorized personnel have access to specific AI systems.
Continuous Monitoring Systems
Continuous monitoring through AI-specific SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems enables real-time detection of anomalous AI behavior. These tools, integrated with artificial intelligence, identify suspicious patterns and trigger automatic alerts for security teams.
Data Loss Prevention
Implementation of AI-specific Data Loss Prevention (DLP) prevents AI models and training data from being inappropriately shared, whether through human error or malicious action. These solutions analyze AI system outputs, automatically blocking attempts at model extraction or data leakage.
Validation and Testing
Finally, regular AI red team exercises and algorithmic audits validate the effectiveness of implemented measures, identifying vulnerabilities before they are exploited by malicious agents.
Automation and continuous compliance monitoring
Automation has become an essential pillar for maintaining EU AI Act compliance consistently and efficiently. In 2026, organizations that rely solely on manual processes face serious non-compliance risks, especially considering the growing volume of AI systems deployed daily.
Automated Monitoring Systems
The IT department must implement automated systems that continuously monitor AI system performance and compliance status. This includes tools that automatically detect when:
- AI models drift
- Performance degrades
- Bias emerges
These systems generate real-time alerts for possible violations. AI governance platforms and model monitoring solutions are fundamental in this process.
Real-time Reporting
Automated monitoring also enables real-time compliance reporting generation, facilitating internal and external audits. Integrated dashboards can display metrics such as:
- AI system performance
- Number of bias incidents detected
- Status of risk mitigation measure implementation
Proactive Model Management
Additionally, automation ensures that AI model lifecycle policies are consistently applied, automatically retiring models that have exceeded their approved operational parameters. This proactive approach significantly reduces the risk of fines and strengthens the organization's position before EU supervisory authorities, demonstrating serious commitment to AI safety and compliance.
Integration between IT, legal, and other areas for EU AI Act success
Effective EU AI Act implementation cannot be viewed as the exclusive responsibility of a single department. In 2026, the most successful companies in AI compliance are those that have established structured collaboration between IT, legal, human resources, product development, and other strategic areas.
Cross-Departmental Collaboration
The legal department provides technical interpretation of the regulation and defines compliance guidelines, while IT translates these requirements into practical solutions and safe systems. This partnership is fundamental for creating AI governance policies that are both legally sound and technically viable.
The human resources area plays a crucial role in training employees and implementing internal AI ethics policies. Product development, in turn, needs to align its AI features with transparency and safety requirements.
Strategic Implementation Framework
An effective strategy involves:
- Regular meetings between these areas
- Creation of multidisciplinary AI ethics committees
- Establishment of clear communication flows
IT acts as the technical link that enables strategic decisions made jointly.
Benefits of Integration
This integration allows:
- More agile response to AI incidents
- Coordinated implementation of new governance features
- Continuous compliance maintenance
Companies adopting this collaborative approach report greater efficiency in AI management and significant reduction of regulatory risks.
Next steps to strengthen IT participation in AI governance
Effective IT participation in AI governance is no longer an option, but a strategic necessity for organizations that wish to prosper in 2026. With an increasingly rigorous regulatory landscape and constantly evolving consumer expectations, companies need to act quickly to strengthen their AI compliance practices.
Immediate Action Items
The first step is conducting a complete audit of current AI systems and processes, identifying gaps in compliance and improvement opportunities. Next, invest in continuous training of IT teams, ensuring they are updated with best practices and emerging AI governance technologies.
Governance Framework Implementation
Establish clear AI governance, defining specific responsibilities and creating efficient communication channels between IT, legal, and other departments. Consider implementing technologies like AI-by-Design and automation of compliance processes to optimize resources and reduce risks.
Strategic Investment Perspective
Remember: AI governance is an investment in your organization's future. Companies that prioritize AI safety and transparency gain:
- Greater customer trust
- Reduced regulatory risks
- Positioning as leaders in their markets
Start today strengthening your IT's participation in the EU AI Act compliance journey.