Skip to main content
Calendly logo

Calendly

Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 13 Feb 2026

D-
AITS IA

AI Trust Summary

AI Training
Possibly (generic mention of service improvement)
Data Retention
Partially mentioned (no defined period)
Opt-out
Only generic controls (cookies, ads)
AIPrivacy
D-
BasePrivacy
A-

Safer Alternatives

Higher-rated software in the same category

See Full Alternative Comparison

Attention Points in AI (1)

AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 1 criteria.

Ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures not documented

Source: vendor public documents

Compliances in AI (3)

AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

AI features clearly identified with their purposes

AI training opt-out control available

Use of artificial intelligence clearly disclosed in policies

Source: vendor public documents

Highlights in Privacy (3)

Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

Sensitive data processing without additional documented safeguards

Data controller and processor roles clearly defined

Data controller identity and contact clearly disclosed

Source: vendor public documents

Conformance analysis (20)

Premium Feature
AITS Criterion 9
Compliant

Data controller and processor roles clearly defined

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

AITS Criterion 10
Compliant

Data controller identity and contact clearly disclosed

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

AITS Criterion 11
Compliant

Privacy contact channel available

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

Source: vendor public documents

Follow this company and access all 20 criteria

Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis

Sign up free

Don't miss any update

Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores

Sign up free

Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit

Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community

Trust guarantees

Peer review

users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.

Public history

vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.

Participate

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Enhancing Communication and Collaboration with Calendly: Privacy Insights

Transparency in Data Control

Calendly excels in providing transparency regarding its data control practices, which is crucial for users concerned about privacy. With an impressive OPTI Base (Privacy) Score of 86%, the platform clearly outlines the identity and contact information of the data controller. This clarity empowers users to understand who is managing their data and facilitates the exercise of their rights under regulations like GDPR and LGPD. Users can easily reach out to the data controller for inquiries or concerns, fostering trust and accountability.

Clear Purpose of Data Processing

Another strength of Calendly lies in its clear categorization of data processing purposes. The platform lists the specific purposes for which user data is collected, ensuring that users are well-informed about how their information will be used. This transparency aligns with best practices in data privacy and helps users make informed decisions about their engagement with the software. By knowing the exact reasons for data collection, users can better assess their comfort level with the platform.

Lack of Ethical AI Documentation

Despite its strengths, Calendly faces significant challenges in the realm of AI governance. The OPTI IA Score of 29% highlights a critical weakness: the absence of documented ethical AI principles. This lack of transparency raises concerns about potential biases and discrimination in the services provided. Users should be aware that without clear guidelines and measures to mitigate bias, the AI-driven features of Calendly may inadvertently lead to unequal treatment of users. To navigate this risk, users should remain vigilant about how AI features are applied and consider limiting their reliance on automated functionalities until further safeguards are established.

Insufficient Safeguards for Sensitive Data

Another area of concern is the handling of sensitive data. Calendly does not document additional safeguards for processing sensitive information, which could expose users to privacy risks. Users should be cautious when sharing sensitive data through the platform and consider implementing additional security measures, such as encryption or anonymization, when possible. It’s advisable to review the types of data being shared and minimize the disclosure of sensitive information unless absolutely necessary.

Practical Settings and Precautions

To maximize privacy while using Calendly, users should take proactive steps to adjust their settings. Ensure that you review and customize your privacy settings within the platform. For instance, users can limit the visibility of their availability and restrict access to their calendar to only trusted contacts. Additionally, consider disabling any features that utilize AI for scheduling to mitigate risks associated with bias until further documentation is provided by Calendly.

Exploring Alternatives and Enhancements

If the weaknesses in Calendly's AI governance and data handling practices raise concerns, users may want to explore alternative scheduling tools that prioritize ethical AI and robust data protection measures. Look for platforms that provide comprehensive documentation on their AI principles and offer strong safeguards for sensitive data. Additionally, users can advocate for enhanced transparency from Calendly by providing feedback and requesting improvements in their documentation and practices. This proactive approach not only helps individual users but also contributes to a broader push for accountability in the industry.

Other Communication and Collaboration software

Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player

Source: vendor public documents

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Scope & Limitations

TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).

The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.

TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.

Source: vendor public documents